Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

br: optimize memory allocation in waitUntilAllScheduleStopped #58806

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arturmelanchyk
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bornchanger for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Hi @arturmelanchyk. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a pingcap member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR created by contributors and need ORG member send '/ok-to-test' to start testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 8, 2025
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Hi @arturmelanchyk. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR created by contributors and need ORG member send '/ok-to-test' to start testing. labels Jan 8, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.6848%. Comparing base (8390fc4) to head (49cd4f6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #58806        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.0978%   74.6848%   +1.5870%     
================================================
  Files          1676       1691        +15     
  Lines        463791     463892       +101     
================================================
+ Hits         339021     346457      +7436     
+ Misses       103929      95827      -8102     
- Partials      20841      21608       +767     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 46.0126% <0.0000%> (?)
unit 72.3073% <0.0000%> (+0.0234%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 61.5938% <0.0000%> (+15.8608%) ⬆️

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 8, 2025

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue label, please provide the linked issue number on one line in the PR body, for example: Issue Number: close #123 or Issue Number: ref #456.

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.


Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked label, please finished the tests then check the finished items in description.

For example:

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.

@arturmelanchyk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @hawkingrei
could you please look into this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants