-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unifying Remove function with PA #2776
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
65b5f6c
to
5e675d8
Compare
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
3 similar comments
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
4619d74
to
8983927
Compare
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
1 similar comment
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
9dbde75
to
617a7fd
Compare
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
2 similar comments
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
…d (value) multiple times.
4ea55b9
to
42a16ef
Compare
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
✅ No public API change. #Resolved |
src/libraries/Microsoft.PowerFx.Core/Public/Values/CollectionTableValue.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
{ | ||
return errorRecord.Error; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we should discuss this.
This is eagerly scanning the entire table. Can we confirm that's the language semantics?
The danger is:
- that could be a lot of work upfront
- that could prevent future optimizations
- in paging/delegation cases, we don't download entire table . It could be a random set of rows. If there are error rows, they may or may not show up in that random set.
✅ No public API change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No description provided.