You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Immortal objects might lead to some unexpected results for users that are (unfortunately) messing with reference count details, as seen in #127191; but currently, there's no way to determine what objects are actually immortal.
Immortality is an implementation detail, but it still does affect reference counting, and given that it's not very safe to rely on very specific reference counts, we don't want the only way to check for immortality to be via sys.getrefcount. So, given that we already have sys._is_interned, it seems fitting to add a sys._is_immortal alongside it.
If we go with this, I think it's also a good idea to note it in some of the documentation. For example, sys.getrefcount says this:
some objects are immortal and have a very high refcount that does not reflect the actual number of references.
Here, it might be a good idea to mention my proposed sys._is_immortal, so there's less ambiguity about the returned value.
Immortality is an implementation detail, but it still does affect reference counting, and given that it's not very safe to rely on very specific reference counts, we don't want the only way to check for immortality to be via sys.getrefcount. So, given that we already have sys._is_interned, it seems fitting to add a sys._is_immortal alongside it.
What is the use-case to check if something is immortal at python level? Adding it for consistency reason alone isn't enough as it a very specific impl detail of CPython. I would like to know the use case before exposing it at Python level.
Differentiating between "a lot of references" and an immortal object (e.g. for debugging). It's not a good idea to have users rely on an object having a specific number of references to declare it immortal, because we change the immortal reference count, and objects with deferred reference counts also have "very large" reference counts. (FWIW, immortality might not even be done with a fixed refcount someday--that's not something we can deprecate at a sys.getrefcount level.)
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
Immortal objects might lead to some unexpected results for users that are (unfortunately) messing with reference count details, as seen in #127191; but currently, there's no way to determine what objects are actually immortal.
Immortality is an implementation detail, but it still does affect reference counting, and given that it's not very safe to rely on very specific reference counts, we don't want the only way to check for immortality to be via
sys.getrefcount
. So, given that we already have sys._is_interned, it seems fitting to add asys._is_immortal
alongside it.If we go with this, I think it's also a good idea to note it in some of the documentation. For example,
sys.getrefcount
says this:Here, it might be a good idea to mention my proposed
sys._is_immortal
, so there's less ambiguity about the returned value.cc @erlend-aasland
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
No response given
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
sys._is_immortal
for identifying immortal objects #128510The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: