You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Bascially, I would like to be able to get the 100 (limit) people who are closest to a certain location. And if possible sort them afterwards but that can be done in post processing if needed.
I am building an application that shows me nodes who are close to my location. Let's say I have 5 nodes: A, B, C, D and E. Node A is closest to me and node E is the farthest away. I expect the following query to return A, B and C but instead it returns A, B and E.
I just found out through the Discord server that the sort is not related to the location (which I thought it was). I currently get a fairly good results if I make 2 separate queries LT and GT but if I add more filtering, some nodes nearby that should be in the results get dropped.
An example of what I'd like might look like this (if you implement this I trust you will use better naming than me).
Bascially, I would like to be able to get the 100 (limit) people who are closest to a certain location. And if possible sort them afterwards but that can be done in post processing if needed.
I am building an application that shows me nodes who are close to my location. Let's say I have 5 nodes: A, B, C, D and E. Node A is closest to me and node E is the farthest away. I expect the following query to return A, B and C but instead it returns A, B and E.
I just found out through the Discord server that the sort is not related to the location (which I thought it was). I currently get a fairly good results if I make 2 separate queries LT and GT but if I add more filtering, some nodes nearby that should be in the results get dropped.
An example of what I'd like might look like this (if you implement this I trust you will use better naming than me).
For more context (Neo4J Discord thread): https://discord.com/channels/787399249741479977/1148644450097168524
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: