You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The TextMate grammar used for Q# syntax highlighting in VS Code is missing some patterns that would help the syntax highlighting look nicer.
Compare:
The Q# looks pretty boring in comparison to other languages with good support.
I think we can start by defining patterns for function calls and numeric literals, which are seen in these screenshots. There may be others that are interesting as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have function definitions, function calls, numbers and variables all working.
However, function calls and variables also end up applied to attributes and to imports. Is it better that I make designated rules for them as part of this issue, or would it be better to make a followup?
(this comment was edited several times as I kept working on the issue, sorry about that).
The TextMate grammar used for Q# syntax highlighting in VS Code is missing some patterns that would help the syntax highlighting look nicer.
Compare:
The Q# looks pretty boring in comparison to other languages with good support.
I think we can start by defining patterns for function calls and numeric literals, which are seen in these screenshots. There may be others that are interesting as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: