You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We propose changing the notation in the documentation, docstrings, and code the representation of wealth and savings from $b$ to $a$. The current notation uses the character $b$ indicative of "bonds". Examples include $b_{j,s,t}$ and $b_{j,s+1,t+1}$ in the household budget constraint. We propose changing the notation in the documentation and code to $a$ for "assets". Examples of the notation would be $a_{j,s,t}$ for wealth at the beginning of the period and $a_{j,s+1,t+1}$ for the savings decision.
We propose changing the notation in the documentation, docstrings, and code the representation of wealth and savings from$b$ to $a$ . The current notation uses the character $b$ indicative of "bonds". Examples include $b_{j,s,t}$ and $b_{j,s+1,t+1}$ in the household budget constraint. We propose changing the notation in the documentation and code to $a$ for "assets". Examples of the notation would be $a_{j,s,t}$ for wealth at the beginning of the period and $a_{j,s+1,t+1}$ for the savings decision.
cc: @jdebacker
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: